Back in February I received a really intriguing email from an old tutor of mine at Falmouth. It was an invitation to take part in a project that would bring together six artists, twelve writers and six climate scientists from the Met Office to create a speculative almanack. The project would include a visit to the Met Office to meet everyone involved in person, to explore the almanacks in the Met Office’s archives, and to generate ideas.
Excited and very curious, I said “yes” immediately and awaited further news. Within a few email exchanges, I’d received more information about the project concept and the trip to Exeter to visit the Met Office had been arranged. The 13th of May came around and myself and the other artists and writers met at the Rougemont Hotel in central Exeter before travelling to the Met Office’s Collaboration Building in the city’s outskirts. There the fun began!
Over the course of a day and a half, we learnt about the history of almanacks and their multifarious forms and audiences; heard from the climate scientists about the immense complexity of weather forecasting; toured the Met Office headquarters and discovered the huge breadth of work done there; explored the eerie rooms where Cray – the Met Office’s former supercomputer (and the eponymous prognosticator of our almanack) – used to live; developed ideas for new symbols that might help us navigate our changing climate; quizzed the scientists about their specialisms (fire, flooding, agriculture, climate communication) to start generating ideas for the content of the almanack; played with writing poetry in beeswax; attempted to summon the ghost of Cray with the help of a Ouija board; ate more cake than is acceptable; and bonded over our shared enthusiasm for the richness of the almanack form and the importance of the subject at its heart.
Now, we have a few months to develop our contributions to the almanack, collaborating and/or working independently as we choose. I’m keen to draw upon my interest in the role of the fossil fuel lobby in spreading climate disinformation; what would an almanack published or sponsored by BP or Exxon Mobil look like? While much of the content of historical almanacks might be described as misinformation rather than disinformation, there were some seemingly unscrupulous authors who took advantage of their influence to further their own aims. Take William Salmon, for example, who in his 1684 almanack predicted an outbreak of the plague and then advertised his homemade plague cures on the very next page (thank you to Ben Smith, the project lead, for this specific insight). I am also, predictably (…), very interested in making work about the impact of the climate crisis on our food systems, and would like to explore how the almanack form could be used to support community food sovereignty and resilience. Let’s see!
Project details:
The project was initiated by Dr Ben Smith, Senior Lecturer in Creative Writing at the University of Exeter, specialising in environmental and speculative literature. It is part of a two year, AHRC-funded fellowship, A History of Storms: New Approaches to Climate Fiction and Climate Literacy.
The project’s point of contact at the Met Office is Professor Peter Stott, Science Fellow in Climate Attribution at the Met Office and author of Hot Air: The Inside Story of the Battle Against Climate Change Denial
The production of the almanack is being directed by Luke Thompson, Editor at Guillemot Press, and Phyllida Bluemel, artist, designer and lecturer at Falmouth University.
